John Edwards has hammered down some pretty good points about the state of America nowadays. There are indeed "Two Americas" but I'd like to examine this issue a little more.
I received this email yesterday (from a Republic) circulating a (typical) straw man smear on Democratic policy. It reinforces the claim that kos pointed out in his post today, that Republics (and Libertarians) MUST kill the notion that
"...Democrats [are] the generous protector of middle-class [working family] interests."
Follow me down the rabid hole (and yes, they attack Al Gore too)
Guns don't kill people, people kill people right? So why are conservatives against programs that would remove a violent offender's reason to kill? If the pro-gun lobby wants a right to defend themselves against "crazies" with guns, then they need to do all they can to remove the social roots of violence, namely the problems associated with poverty.
I know this sounds overly dramatic but I'd like to tell you why Liberalism and the works accomplished by liberals literally saved my life and more importantly why they've given me one worth living
I apologize in advance if this has already been diaried. I looked for it, and didn't see it anywhere, and I thought it was interesting.
Scientific American runs a monthly column called "Sustainable Developments" written by Jeffrey D. Sachs, director of the Earth Institute at Columbia University.
This month's column takes a look at the effect of higher taxes and social welfare spending on the overall prosperity of the nation.
The whole article is here
Does social spending and the higher taxation required to support it strangle the economy, as supply siders suggest?
Most of the debate in the U.S. is clouded by vested interests and by ideology. Yet there is by now a rich empirical record to judge these issues scientifically. The evidence may be found by comparing a group of relatively free-market economies that have low to moderate rates of taxation and social outlays with a group of social-welfare states that have high rates of taxation and social outlays.
During the Vietnam era, there was a moratorium for peace. It was a one day event, as I recall. I did not understand it, and I did not participate.
I recall one of our teachers said that anyone who intended to participate in the moratorium, would be required to write down the definition of the word, moratorium, and hand in their papers.
That made me glad I was not participating, because I did not know what the word meant.
In 1953, Dwight D. Eisenhower gave a speech. I do not know how to insert links into my diary essays. I hope I am not banned for failing to do a thing I do not know how to do.
Another Kossack used a short quote from this speech yesterday. I googled the speech, and found it, and printed it out. It is called the, "Chance for Peace Address." It is also known as the "Cross of Iron" speech.
Reading the speech gave me an idea for a diary essay.
Also, I do not know how to add [blockquote] tags. I tried it. It did not work.
I hope I am not banned for lack of computer skills.
I spent the day after Election Day of 2000 in a room with two dozen women, all of us convened there for the same reason: to learn how to write more competitive federal grant proposals that resulted in funding for programs that helped our communities. We all came into the seminar knowing that the previous day's election was up in the air, waiting for recounts and validation, but also with a firm faith in the notion that the better man would win. That the person who offered hope, and solutions, and tools with which to attain them, would by day's end be our next President.
I am seriously considering the lack of fiscal restraint is actually a long term plan to gut all the social safety nets. Extreme fiscal irresponsibility today will lead later to the inability to fund social programs in the near and far future. Simply, there won't be any money left over after paying off debts to go towards: the Arts, unemployment, education, housing assistance, healthcare, etc.
I am the proud product of taxpayer investment. In exchange for my giving this country two years of military service, they gave me enough money to get through college. When I decided to go to law school, they chipped in again by subsidizing my student loans, giving me help with daycare expenses and letting me have some badly needed cash in the form of an earned income credit. I'm not rich by any stretch, but I'm comfortable. Without the "hand up" from the American taxpayer, I'd probably be worrying that my $10 an hour receptionist job was about to be offshored.
Bloated Defense Budgets=Corruption, Social Program Cuts-Well You'll Miss Them When Needed, Veteran Program Shortfalls Speak For Themselves and This Nation!!
President Bush plans to propose a $2.7 trillion budget tomorrow that would shrink most parts of the government unrelated to the nation's security while slowing spending on Medicare by $36 billion during the next five years, according to White House documents.
February 3, 2006
WASHINGTON - President Bush's 2007 budget seeks a nearly 5 percent increase in Defense Department spending, to $439.3 billion, with significantly more money for weapons programs, according to senior Pentagon officials and documents obtained by The Associated Press.
I fly several times a month for work and I chat up every person I can about politics (nothing like having a captive audience for 3 1/2 hours). I can't count the number of times I've sat on planes next to someone who told me they were Republican because they believe in personal responsibility.
Republicans believe in personal responsibility? That always makes me want to laugh so hard that my orange juice comes out my nose (and if you were wondering, no that's not where the name OrangeClouds came from... it was a Tori Amos lyric).
Before you start pointing to the white collar criminals we have running our country and "self regulating" our largest businesses - wait. I don't think these Republicans next to me on the airplanes are lying...exactly. Read on and I'll explain...
In George Bush's America, we are all supposed to be owners of our fates. We are to own our retirement accounts, act like the people running corporations and make our money grow. We are all supposed to be in control of our own destiny. Sadly, life often intrudes on well laid plans. Around Thanksgiving I put up a diary that was part scream for help, part frustration, part knowing when the impossible had met the difficult and impossible had won. The wonderful people here at the Daily Kos responded. And I am grateful. A little update is in order, where if the gratitude is not evident, then shame on me. From the suggestions received, I got a long list of things to do, and a lot to be thankful about. And the saga of disability goes on. Your thoughts made me think and better times are going to be ahead. Or else.
This morning I was reading my local newspaper, and I was reading over the Editorial pages seeing if there was anything interesting to really read there.
I usually look for a column by the paper's one columnist, Herb Field to see what has him stirred up lately.
i'm not a big fan of cutting and pasting an article with little commentary added by myself (i think most of those posting here are at least fairly informed of current events), but i really don't know what much else to add to this. res ipsa...
In several previous diaries and numerous posts, I have described being a traumatic brain injury survivor and dependency on social programs as a means of survival. (Social Security, Medicaire, Medicaid, Food Stamps, Section 8 Housing.)
Today was an unforgettable experience dealing with vocational rehabilitiation/voc rehab, or, as I refer to it joke rehab.
The logic behind joke rehab appears to make sense--provide training to a person w/a disabilitiy and assist w/job placement so that he/she will succeed in an employment setting and no longer be a recipient of entitlement programs, such as Social Security Disability, Food Stamps, and the like.
In return for this supposed investment in a person's abilities, as opposed to focusing on a persons disabilities, the individual receiving services will become a productive member of society.